Access to Financial Assistance Programs and Their Impact on Overall Spending on Oral Anticancer Medications at an Integrated Specialty Pharmacy.

PURPOSE: Financial assistance (FA) programs are increasingly used to help patients afford oral anticancer medications (OAMs), but access to such programs and their impact on out-of-pocket (OOP) spending has not been well explored. This study aimed to (1) characterize the impact of receipt of FA on both OOP spending and likelihood of catastrophic spending on OAMs and (2) evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in access to FA programs. METHODS: Patients with a cancer diagnosis prescribed an OAM anytime between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021 were included in this retrospective, single-center study at an integrated specialty pharmacy affiliated with a tertiary academic cancer center. Fixed-effect regression models were used to characterize the impact of receipt of FA on overall spending and likelihood of catastrophic spending on OAMs, as well as explore the association of race/ethnicity with receipt of FA. RESULTS: Across 1,186 patients prescribed an OAM, 37% received FA. Receipt of FA was associated with lower annual spending on OAMs (ß = -$1,236 US dollars [USD; 95% CI, -$1,841 to -$658], P < .001) but not reduced risk of catastrophic spending (odds ratio [OR], 0.442 [95% CI, 0.755 to 3.199], P = .23). Non-White patients (OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.85], P = .004) and patients who spoke English as a second language (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.90], P = .02) were less likely to receive FA compared with White and English-speaking patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: FA programs can mitigate high OOP spending but not for patients who spend at catastrophic levels. There are racial/ethnic and language disparities in access to such programs. Future studies should evaluate access to FA programs across diverse delivery settings.

Characterization of direct oral anticoagulants use in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment are of interest in oncology due to ease of administration and lack of need for therapeutic monitoring compared to other anticoagulants. Data supporting their use in patients with hematologic malignancies post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) are limited. The purpose of the study is to characterize DOAC use in HCT patients. This multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis included allogeneic and autologous HCT recipients. The primary outcome was major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB)/minor bleeding and VTE recurrence. Of 126 patients, 91 (72.2%) patients received an autologous HCT, and 35 (27.8%) patients received an allo-HCT. No major bleeding occurred in either transplant recipient groups. In autologous HCT recipients, CRNMB/minor bleeding occurred in four (4.4%) patients and VTE recurrence occurred in one (1.1%) patient. For allogeneic HCT recipients, CRNMB/minor bleeding occurred in five (14.3%) patients and VTE recurrence occurred in two (5.7%) patients. For patients that experienced a CRNMB, five (100%) of the allogeneic HCT and two (50%) of the autologous HCT recipients were thrombocytopenic at the time of bleeding. Only 38.5% of patients who experienced a drug-drug interaction requiring DOAC dose adjustment received the appropriate dose adjustment. DOACs were associated with low rates of recurrent VTE and no major bleeding events, similar to published data on DOAC use in the general cancer patient population. This suggests that DOACs may be safe therapeutic options with proactive management of drug interactions and careful monitoring for bleeding events, especially in the allogeneic HCT population where minor bleeding rates were slightly higher.

Evaluation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis protocol in hematopoietic cell transplant patients.

Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients are at risk for thromboembolic and bleeding complications. There is limited evidence regarding the optimal approach to managing venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hospitalized patients undergoing HCT. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the incidence of bleeding and VTE events in hospitalized HCT patients who received VTE prophylaxis per our institution's VTE Prophylaxis Protocol (VPP), with either enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously daily or heparin 5 000 units subcutaneously twice daily, compared to historical controls who did not receive VTE prophylaxis. The primary outcome was a composite of major bleeding events, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and minor bleeding. The secondary outcome was a composite of VTE events. A total of 614 patients were evaluated, including 278 prior to and 336 after implementation of VPP. VTE prophylaxis resulted in no difference in bleeding events (15.1% in the pre-VPP group vs. 14.6% in the post-VPP group, p = 0.86) or composite of major and CRNMB events (0.72% vs. 0.30%, p = 0.59). There was a trend toward lower incidence of VTE events in the post-VPP group which did not reach statistical significance (8.6% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.20). We conclude that VTE prophylaxis does not pose additional bleeding risk in HCT patients.

Intensity of Cyclophosphamide-Based Bridging Therapy Before Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Myeloma.

Patients receiving autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) may require bridging therapy (BT) before CAR-T infusion to maintain some level of disease control. Alkylators, such as cyclophosphamide (Cy), are often used in regimens, either in high-intensity regimens, such as modified hyperCVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone), or once-weekly regimens, such as KCd (carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone). However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal BT alkylator dose intensity in MM. We performed a single-center analysis of all instances of BT before planned autologous CAR-T for MM during a 5-year period ending in April 2022. We classified bridging regimens into 3 cohorts: (1) hyperfractionated Cy (HyperCy) with inpatient Cy every 12 to 24 hours or as a continuous i.v. infusion; (2) less intensive Cy dosing (WeeklyCy), such as KCd; and (3) NonCy, in which no alkylators were used in BT. Demographic, disease-related, and treatment-related characteristics were collected for all patients. The 3 BT cohorts were compared using the Fisher exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and log-rank test, as appropriate. We identified 70 discrete BT instances among 64 unique patients, including 29 (41%) with HyperCy, 23 (33%) with WeeklyCy, and 18 (26%) with NonCy. The median total Cy dosing during BT in the 3 groups were 2100 mg/m2, 615 mg/m2, and 0 mg/m2, respectively. Age, number of prior lines of therapy, triple-class refractory status, presence of high-risk cytogenetics, extramedullary disease, bone marrow plasma cell burden, involved free light chain (iFLC) kinetics before collection, and other measures of disease aggressiveness were comparable across the 3 cohorts. iFLC levels rose ≥25% and ≥100 mg/L during BT (approximating progressive disease) in comparable proportions (P = .25) among the cohorts: 52% for HyperCy, 39% for WeeklyCy, and 28% for NonCy. All BT instances without subsequent CAR-T were due to manufacturing failures. Among 61 instances of BT followed by CAR-T, vein-to-vein times were slightly longer (P = .03) with HyperCy (45 days) compared with WeeklyCy (39 days) and NonCy (46.5 days). Neutrophil recovery times were similar in the 3 cohorts, but platelet recovery took longer with HyperCy (64 days) compared with WeeklyCy (42 days) and NonCy (12 days). Progression-free survival was comparable among the cohorts, but median overall survival (OS) was not: 15.3 months with HyperCy, versus 30.0 months with WeeklyCy and not reached with NonCy. In our retrospective analysis of BT before CAR-T therapy in MM, HyperCy did not result in superior disease control than WeeklyCy despite a 3-fold higher dose of Cy. In contrast, HyperCy was associated with longer post-CAR-T platelet recovery and worse OS despite comparable measurements of disease aggressiveness and tumor burden. Study limitations include our small sample size, as well as confounding from gestalt markers of MM aggressiveness that might have led to poorer outcomes as well as physicians' decision to prescribe HyperCy. Given the rarity of objective disease responses to chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory MM, our analysis suggests that hyperfractionated Cy regimens do not outperform once-weekly Cy regimens for most patients who require BT before CAR-T therapy.

Safety and Efficacy of BCMA CAR-T Cell Therapy in Older Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

Risks of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) include cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), cytopenias, and infections. The efficacy and safety of BCMA CAR-T therapy in the geriatric setting, including complications such as falls and delirium, which may be more prevalent in older patients, have not been fully analyzed. We wanted to analyze the efficacy and safety of BCMA CAR-T therapy among older patients (age ≥70 at infusion) versus younger patients with MM. We analyzed all patients with MM who received any autologous BCMA CAR-T therapy over a 5-year period at our institution. Key endpoints included CRS, ICANS incidence, days to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery, incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG < 400 mg/dL), infections within 6 months, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Of 83 analyzed patients (age range 33-77), 22 (27%) were aged ≥70 at infusion. The older cohort had lower creatinine clearances (median 67.3 versus 91.9 mL/min, P < .001) and a higher proportion of patients with performance status ≥1 (59% versus 30%, P = .02) but were otherwise similar. Rates of any-grade CRS, any-grade ICANS, and days to ANC recovery were similar between groups. Rates of baseline hypogammaglobulinemia were 36% in older patients and 30% in younger patients (P = .60), whereas post-infusion hypogammaglobulinemia occurred in 82% versus 72%, respectively (P = .57). Infections occurred in 36% (n = 8) of the older cohort versus 52% (n = 32) of the younger cohort (P = .22). There were no statistically significant differences between the older and younger cohorts in terms of documented falls (9% versus 15%, P = .72) or non-ICANS delirium (5% versus 7%, P = 1.0). Median PFS was 13.1 months in older patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-not reached [NR]) versus 12.5 months in younger patients (95% CI 11.3-22.5, P = .42. Median OS was not reached in the older cohort (95% CI, NR-NR) versus 31.4 months in the younger cohort (95% CI, 24.8-NR) with P = .04. However, age ≥70 was not a significant predictor of OS after adjusting for high-risk cytogenetics, triple-class refractoriness, extramedullary disease, and bone marrow plasma cell burden. Although limited by small sample size and unmeasured confounders, our retrospective analysis did not demonstrate significant increases in CAR-T toxicity among older patients. This included toxicities associated with geriatric populations such as falls and delirium. Our paradoxical finding of borderline better OS among patients aged ≥70, which was not significant in regression modeling, may have been due to selection bias in favor of disproportionately healthy CAR-T candidates in the geriatric population. Overall, BCMA CAR-T remains a safe and effective option for older patients with MM.

Predictors of lenalidomide maintenance duration after autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: For patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have undergone autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT), the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide is a first-line option for maintenance therapy. Because longer durations of lenalidomide maintenance are associated with improved survival, identifying strategies to avoid premature cessation of maintenance is an important priority in the post-transplant setting. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this analysis was to identify specific clinical predictors of lenalidomide treatment duration that could guide optimal medication management. Key secondary objectives included predictors of intolerable toxicity, rationale for lenalidomide dose reduction/discontinuation, and characterization of dose adjustments. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective, multi-center cohort study included adults with MM who underwent auto-SCT and initiated maintenance lenalidomide between 01/01/2012 and 02/28/2021. Variables assessed as potential predictors of maintenance duration or intolerable toxicity included age, body mass index (BMI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status at time of auto-SCT, renal function, initial lenalidomide dose, use of combination maintenance therapy, and cytogenetic risk category. RESULTS: Among 299 patients included, the median age at time of auto-SCT was 62 years (range 30-77). The majority of patients had standard-risk cytogenetics (64%) and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 (72%). In the overall population, the median duration of maintenance was 1.3 years (range 0.3-8.6 years). The median initial dose of lenalidomide was 10 mg daily (range 2.5-25 mg). During the study period, 35% of patients had a dose reduction due to toxicity, 21% stopped lenalidomide due to disease progression, and 19% stopped due to toxicity. Multivariate linear regression analyses did not identify any significant predictors of lenalidomide duration or discontinuation due to intolerable toxicity. The most frequently reported toxicities leading to discontinuation were cytopenias, rash, and fatigue. CONCLUSION: This analysis did not identify any significant risk factors to predict the duration of lenalidomide maintenance or discontinuation for toxicity following auto-SCT in patients with MM. While limited by the retrospective design and relatively small sample size, our findings suggest that a priori lenalidomide dose reductions based on patient co-morbidities or performance status may not substantially affect the duration of lenalidomide maintenance.

Complete response following treatment of plasma cell leukemia with venetoclax and dexamethasone: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare but aggressive variant of multiple myeloma (MM) with a poor prognosis. Due to the limited number of prospective clinical trials studying PCL, treatment options are often extrapolated from data available for the treatment of MM. Venetoclax has recently demonstrated antimyeloma activity in patients with relapsed/refractory MM carrying the t(11;14) translocation. However, few cases have reported the analogous efficacy of venetoclax in PCL. CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old Caucasian male developed relapsed PCL despite treatment with hyperCD (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone) and Dara-KRd (daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone). Due to the refractory nature of his disease and the presence of a t(11:14) translocation, the patient was subsequently initiated on venetoclax 400 mg daily and dexamethasone 4 mg once weekly. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: The patient achieved a complete response by International Myeloma Working Group criteria three months after initiating venetoclax-dexamethasone, including a repeat bone marrow biopsy that showed no abnormal plasma cells. He successfully underwent consolidation with melphalan-based autologous stem cell transplantation. He remains disease-free 9 months after venetoclax initiation. DISCUSSION: Combination all-oral therapy with venetoclax and dexamethasone can induce deep hematologic responses in patients with relapsed/refractory PCL carrying the t(11;14) translocation.

Digital Life Coaching During Stem Cell Transplantation: Development and Usability Study.

BACKGROUND: For patients with multiple myeloma receiving high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), acute life disruptions and symptom burden may lead to worsened quality of life (QOL) and increased emotional distress. Digital life coaching (DLC), whereby trained coaches deliver personalized well-being-related support via phone calls and SMS text messaging, has been shown to improve QOL among SCT survivors. However, DLC has not been investigated during the acute peri-SCT period, which is generally characterized by symptomatic exacerbations and 2-week hospitalizations. OBJECTIVE: We launched a single-arm pilot study to investigate the feasibility of patient engagement with DLC during this intensive period. METHODS: We approached English-speaking adult patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous SCT at our center. Enrolled patients received 16 weeks of virtual access to a life coach beginning on day -5 before SCT. Coaches used structured frameworks to help patients identify and overcome personal barriers to well-being. Patients chose the coaching topics and preferred communication styles. Our primary endpoint was ongoing DLC engagement, defined as bidirectional conversations occurring at least once every 4 weeks during the study period. Secondary endpoints were electronic patient-reported outcome assessments of QOL, distress, and sleep disturbances. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients who were screened, 17 (85%) chose to enroll and 15 (75%) underwent SCT as planned. Of these 15 patients (median age 65 years, range 50-81 years), 11 (73%) demonstrated ongoing DLC engagement. The median frequency of bidirectional conversations during the 3-month study period was once every 6.2 days (range 3.9-28 days). During index hospitalizations with median lengths of stay of 16 days (range 14-31 days), the median frequency of conversations was once every 5.3 days (range 2.7-15 days). Electronic patient-reported outcome assessments (94% adherence) demonstrated an expected QOL nadir during the second week after SCT. The prevalence of elevated distress was highest immediately before and after SCT, with 69% of patients exhibiting elevated distress on day -5 and on day +2. CONCLUSIONS: DLC may be feasible for older patients during intensive hospital-based cancer treatments such as autologous SCT for multiple myeloma. The limitations of our study include small sample size, selection bias among enrolled patients, and heterogeneity in DLC use. Based on the positive results of this pilot study, a larger phase 2 randomized study of DLC during SCT is underway to investigate the efficacy of DLC with regard to patient well-being. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04432818; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04432818.

Anthracyclines in a patient with acute leukemia and severe cardiomyopathy requiring mechanical support: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: For young adult patients with acute leukemia, both the efficacy and cardiotoxicity of anthracycline-based regimens have been documented. We report the case of a patient with severe cardiomyopathy, mechanically supported by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), who subsequently developed Philadelphia-chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL). To our knowledge, this is the first report of anthracycline administration in a patient with heart failure requiring mechanical support. CASE REPORT: Our 27-year-old female patient was diagnosed with Ph + B-ALL as part of workup for leukocytosis. Past medical history included non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30-35% and moderate-severe right ventricular dysfunction, for which LVAD had been placed 4 years previously. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: After shared decision-making and multidisciplinary discussions, we felt that hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone alternating with cytarabine and high-dose methotrexate in addition to ponatinib (HyperCVAD-ponatinib) best balanced the patient's goals for aggressive treatment with the potential for rapid and durable remissions. The patient received a single reduced dose of doxorubicin alongside dexrazoxane with her first cycle of HyperCVAD-ponatinib. She attained a complete molecular response 22 days later and remains in remission (with stable cardiac function) 30 months later on maintenance therapy. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, LVAD placement is not an absolute contra-indication to anthracyclines if such therapies offer the best opportunity for a durable response.

Evaluation of subcutaneous daratumumab injections in the ambulatory care setting.

INTRODUCTION: Subcutaneous daratumumab is non-inferior to intravenous daratumumab for the treatment of multiple myeloma and significantly reduced incidence of systemic reactions. However, manufacturer for subcutaneous daratumumab has not provided guidance regarding optimal methods for monitoring for hypersensitivity reactions following subcutaneous daratumumab administration. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in two cohorts of patients who received at least two doses of subcutaneous daratumumab for the treatment of plasma cell disorders: patients with previous exposure to intravenous daratumumab (dara-exposed) and patients without history of intravenous daratumumab (dara-naïve). The primary outcome was incidence of systemic and injection-site reactions following first dose of subcutaneous daratumumab. Secondary analysis included time to systemic and injection-site reactions, grading of adverse reaction, and incidence of second systemic reaction. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were dara-naïve and 49 patients were dara-exposed. Differences in incidence of systemic (dara-naïve: 9.7% vs dara-exposed: 6.1%, p = 0.67) and injection-site reactions (dara-naïve: 12.9% vs dara-exposed: 14.3%, p = 0.99) did not reach statistical significance. Difference in median time to systemic reaction (dara-naïve: 3 h vs dara-exposed: 12 h, p = 0.18) was clinically important but did not reach statistical significance. Median time to injection-site reactions (dara-naïve: 6 h vs dara-exposed: 24 h, p = 0.03) was shorter in the dara-naïve cohort. No clinically meaningful difference was observed for incidence of second systemic reaction. CONCLUSION: Most reactions were mild and did not require medical intervention. Following first subcutaneous daratumumab dose, monitoring for 3 h for dara-naïve patients and no monitoring time for dara-exposed patients for hypersensitivity reactions may be a safe and reasonable practice.

Infectious complications in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma after BCMA CAR T-cell therapy.

B-cell maturation antigen-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (BCMA CAR-T) is an effective treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, the pattern of infectious complications is not well elucidated. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of infection outcomes up to 1 year after BCMA CAR-T for MM from 2018 to 2020. Fifty-five patients with MM were treated with BCMA CAR-T. Before lymphodepletion (LD), 35% of patients had severe hypogammaglobulinemia and 18% had severe lymphopenia. Most patients (68%) received bridging chemotherapy (BC) before LD. In the first month after CAR-T, 98% patients had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia. At 1 year after infusion, 76% patients had hypogammaglobulinemia. With a median follow-up of 6.0 months (95% confidence interval, 4.7-7.4), there were a total of 47 infection events in 29 (53%) patients: 40% bacterial, 53% viral, and 6% fungal. Most (92%) were mild-moderate and of the lower/upper respiratory tract system (68%). Half of the infections (53%) occurred in the first 100 days after CAR-T infusion. Although no statistically significant risk factors for infection were identified, prior lines of therapy, use of BC, recent infections, and post-CAR-T lymphopenia were identified as possible risk factors that need to be further explored. This is the largest study to date to assess infectious complications after BCMA CAR-T. Despite multiple risk factors for severe immunosuppression in this cohort, relatively few life-threatening or severe infections occurred. Further larger studies are needed to better characterize the risk factors for and occurrence of infections after BCMA CAR-T.

Direct oral anticoagulants or low-molecular-weight heparins for venous thromboembolism in patients with brain tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with central nervous system malignancies have limited representation in studies evaluating DOACs for VTE treatment. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of DOACs in comparison with LMWH for cancer-associated VTE in patients with primary brain tumors or secondary brain metastases. MATERIALS & METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, adult patients with a diagnosis of primary brain tumor or secondary brain metastases who received either a DOAC or LMWH for treatment of cancer-associated VTE were evaluated. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage within a 6-month period following the initiation of anticoagulation. Secondary outcomes included the cumulative incidence of any bleeding event, and recurrent VTE events. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2012 and October 9, 2019, one-hundred eleven patients met inclusion criteria. The 6-month cumulative incidence of intracranial hemorrhage was 4.3% (95% CI, 0.74-13.2%) in the DOAC group, compared to 5.9% (95% CI, 1.5-14.9%) in the LMWH group (p = 0.61). The 6-month cumulative incidence of bleeding events was 14.3% (95% CI, 6.2-25.8%) in the DOAC group, compared to 27.8% (95% CI, 15.5-41.6%) in the LMWH group (p = 0.10). The 6-month cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE events was 5.6% in the DOAC group (95% CI, 1.5-14.2%), compared to 6.6% in the LMWH group (95% CI, 1.7-16.5%) (p = 0.96). No differences were found with respect to other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in bleeding or recurrent VTE events between DOACs and LMWH. These findings suggest DOACs may be safe and effective for VTE treatment in this patient population.

Isatuximab, carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) for the management of relapsed multiple myeloma.

The treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma remains challenging. Based on interim data from the randomized Phase III IKEMA study demonstrating a progression-free survival benefit with a combination of isatuximab (Isa, a CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody) and carfilzomib/dexamethasone (Kd) versus Kd alone, Isa-Kd recently received regulatory approval in the USA and Europe for patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior line of therapy (in the USA, up to three prior lines). In this review we discuss the rationale and clinical trial experience to date with Isa-Kd. Although final IKEMA results are pending, Isa-Kd has emerged as an effective and tolerable therapy for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Given the growing number of antibody-containing triplet regimens in this setting, potential niches and limitations for Isa-Kd are also discussed.

Lay abstract For patients with multiple myeloma, navigating cancer relapses can be difficult. The combination of isatuximab, carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd), which was studied in the large ongoing IKEMA study, has recently been approved by government authorities in both the USA and Europe for treating multiple myeloma that has relapsed after initial therapy. Isatuximab is a drug that attacks the CD38 protein on myeloma cancer cells, while carfilzomib is a drug that prevents myeloma cancer cells from properly using and reusing proteins. Dexamethasone is a corticosteroid that has been shown to improve how well other antimyeloma drugs work. In this review, we discuss potential strengths and weaknesses of the Isa-Kd combination for patients with multiple myeloma that has relapsed.

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists (TPO-RAs): Drug Class Considerations for Pharmacists.

The thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag, and lusutrombopag carry unique US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved indications and may be used to increase platelet counts in a variety of conditions. Current indications for available TPO-RAs include treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in cases of insufficient response to prior treatment (avatrombopag, eltrombopag, romiplostim), management of thrombocytopenia in adult patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo a procedure (avatrombopag, lusutrombopag), management of severe aplastic anemia (eltrombopag), and management of thrombocytopenia associated with interferon-based therapy for hepatitis C (eltrombopag). Across current indications, pharmacists can assist in stabilizing platelet counts and help to reduce large undulations commonly seen when starting, stopping, or transitioning between these agents. If therapy modifications may benefit the patient, pharmacists should discuss possible changes with the patient's treatment team or treating physician. When used for ITP, romiplostim, eltrombopag, and avatrombopag stimulate TPO receptors on hematopoietic stem cells (also known as c-Mpl, or CD110) to promote platelet production; however, romiplostim is the only TPO-RA that binds at the same site as endogenous TPO. These subtle mechanistic differences may explain why switching TPO-RA may be clinically advantageous in some situations. As pharmacists are called to counsel patients on TPO-RA use, a deep understanding of potential adverse events and management strategies, as well as appropriate monitoring, will increase the likelihood that patients meet their goals of therapy in the shortest timeframe. Other uses of TPO-RAs are also discussed in this review, including use following hematopoietic stem cell transplant, use in myelodysplastic syndrome, and use in chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.

Impact of Polypharmacy Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Older Adults.

Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cancer, but there is little evidence evaluating the impact of polypharmacy and other medication hazards on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) outcomes. A small number of prior studies have evaluated the impact of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in the setting of alloHCT, with mixed results. We evaluated the effects of pre-alloHCT polypharmacy, PIM use, and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) on post-alloHCT outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), hospital length of stay (LOS), number of non-hematologic grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) within 100 days after alloHCT, and number of readmissions within the first 100 days after alloHCT. The study population was a single-center prospective cohort of 148 patients ≥ 50 years of age. Pre-alloHCT medication lists were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical record, including both scheduled and as-needed medications. PIMs were defined by a modified 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria. DDIs were analyzed using Lexi-Interact. Polypharmacy was common in this population; the median number of medications was seven (range, 0 to 23). Fifty-two patients (35%) were prescribed nine or more medications, and 73 patients (49%) had at least one PIM prescribed. The median number of DDIs was three (range, 0 to 31), and the most common severity was major (48%). After adjusting for age and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Comorbidity Index (HCTCI), both the number of all medications and number of scheduled medications were associated with inferior OS, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.12; P = .02) and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.15; P = .04), respectively. Receipt of nine or more scheduled medications was associated with inferior OS (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.32; P = .02). The number of PIMs was also significantly associated with OS (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.54, P = .05). After adjusting for age, HCTCI, and total number of medications, a greater number of DDIs were significantly associated with longer hospital length of stay (difference, 0.74 days; 95% CI, 0.09 to 1.40, P = .03). In adjusted analyses, there were no significant polypharmacy-related predictors of NRM, LOS, or non-hematologic grade ≥3 AEs. These data demonstrate the utility of pre-alloHCT polypharmacy, PIM use, and DDIs as important prognostic factors and support routine pre-alloHCT medication review by physicians and pharmacists with a goal of appropriate de-prescribing where possible.

Early Time-to-Tocilizumab after B Cell Maturation Antigen-Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Myeloma.

Preemptive administration of tocilizumab (toci) to manage cytokine release syndrome (CRS) after chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy may reduce rates of serious CRS but conversely may worsen neurotoxicity or risk of infections. Optimal toci administration strategies for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR-T therapies have not been evaluated. The objective of this study was to identify whether shorter time-to-toci intervals (hours between first fever attributed to CRS and first dose of toci) have any impact on therapy-related toxicities or clinical outcomes among patients with RRMM receiving BCMA-directed CAR-T therapies. We retrospectively analyzed our institution's experience with 4 BCMA-directed CAR-T therapies (idecabtagene vicleucel, bb21217, ciltacabtagene autoleucel, and orvacabtagene autoceucel) for RRMM over a 3-year period ending in June 2020. We divided patients based on the administration of toci and median time-to-toci interval into early-toci (time-to-toci ≤50th percentile), late-toci (time-to-toci >50th percentile), and no-toci (no toci received) groups. We compared the early-toci and late-toci groups with regard to patient characteristics, weight-based CAR-T toxicities, selected toxicities (CRS, neurotoxicity, macrophage activation syndrome, or infections), and clinical outcomes. Of 50 analyzed patients with a median follow-up of 15.3 months, 76% (n = 38) received ≥1 dose of toci (range, 1 to 3) and were classified into early-toci (time-to-toci ≤12 hours) or late-toci (time-to-toci >12 hours) groups. The 2 groups (n = 19 each) had similar CRS grade distributions, hours to CRS onset, CRS-related biomarkers, and incidences of neurotoxicity or severe infections; however, weight-adjusted CAR-T cell doses were higher in the early-toci group (median 5.99 versus 3.80 × 106 cells/kg, P < 0.01). Peak CRS grades (range, 0 to 2) using American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy consensus criteria, neurotoxicity rates, and rates of severe infections were similar between groups; however, the median CRS duration was 18.6 hours for the early-toci group versus 84.7 hours for the late-toci group. The median progression-free survival was 35.7 months in the early-toci group and 13.2 months in the late-toci group. While limited by small sample size and known confounders such as CAR-T cell dose, our analysis suggests that preemptive toci strategies for CRS management with BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy-specifically, toci administration within 12 hours of the first fever attributed to CRS-do not appear to increase rates of therapy-related toxicities or compromise efficacy. However, total CRS duration may be shorter with early-toci workflows. Prospective validation of our findings may lead to improved safety and cost-effectiveness profiles for CAR-T therapy in RRMM.

Benzodiazepine and zolpidem prescriptions during autologous stem cell transplantation.

Multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may receive benzodiazepine or zolpidem-class (B/Z) medications despite their risks in older patients. Of 205 myeloma patients (36% aged 65+) who underwent ASCT at our institution between 2017 and 2018, we found that B/Z prescription rates for anxiety/insomnia rose significantly from 26% before ASCT to 38% at discharge and 39% at Day +100. B/Z initiation while hospitalized was a strong predictor of B/Z persistence at Day +100. Our findings highlight the role of these potentially inappropriate medications during hospitalizations for ASCT, a period where nonpharmacologic strategies for managing anxiety/insomnia may be feasible.